Karczewski v. Conant Auto Retail, San Diego, Inc.
This text of 693 F. App'x 624 (Karczewski v. Conant Auto Retail, San Diego, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff.
acquiescing dubitante:
I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 F. App'x 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karczewski-v-conant-auto-retail-san-diego-inc-ca9-2017.