Karcol Farms v. Gonzalez

182 So. 2d 412
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 1966
DocketNo. 34636
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 So. 2d 412 (Karcol Farms v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karcol Farms v. Gonzalez, 182 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. See Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. Alday, Fla., 182 So.2d 405, opinion filed February 2, 1966.

The petition is therefore denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS,. DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THOMAS and CALDWELL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Naples v. Conboy
182 So. 2d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 2d 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karcol-farms-v-gonzalez-fla-1966.