Karchman v. Karchman
224 A.D. 773
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the judgment was recovered on default in an action brought to recover a sum of money only; no warrant of attachment was “ granted in the action ” and no service of the summons was made on defendant except by publication. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 232; Dimmerling v. Andrews, 236 N. Y. 43, 46.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. [131 Misc. 462.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Karchman v. Karchman, 224 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
224 A.D. 773 (Karchman v. Karchman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dimmerling v. . Andrews
139 N.E. 774 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Karchman v. Karchman
131 Misc. 462 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)