Karboau v. Department of Motor Vehicles
This text of 114 F. App'x 885 (Karboau v. Department of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Oregon State prisoner Milaudi Karboau appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that an employee of the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles entrapped him into committing the offense of identity theft, and that an Oregon Deputy Sheriff violated his constitutional rights in assessing his eligibility for a pretrial release program and by questioning him outside the presence of his attorney. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders dated January 22, 2003 and March 20, 2003.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karboau-v-department-of-motor-vehicles-ca9-2004.