Karavias v. Angelone
This text of 74 F.3d 1232 (Karavias v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
74 F.3d 1232
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jason Sotiris KARAVIAS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ronald ANGELONE, Director; Robin Hulbert, Ph.D.; Wayne
Kincaid; Dave L. Graham; Ronda Yates; Psychologist
Williams; Samuel L. Batts; James E. Smith; James E.
Briggs; E.C. Morris, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7106.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.
Jason Sotiris Karavias, II, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA; John Britton Russell, Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Karavias v. Angelone, No. CA-95-10 (E.D.Va. July 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38862, 1996 WL 23372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karavias-v-angelone-ca4-1996.