Karavas Fashions, Ltd. v. Bruni & Campisi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Karavas Fashions, Ltd. v. Bruni & Campisi, Inc.

253 A.D.2d 539, 676 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9223

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 31, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 539 (Karavas Fashions, Ltd. v. Bruni & Campisi, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karavas Fashions, Ltd. v. Bruni & Campisi, Inc., 253 A.D.2d 539, 676 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered September 18, 1997, which, upon the granting of the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law after the close of evidence due to the plaintiffs’ failure to establish a prima facie case of negligence against the [540]*540defendant (see, CPLR 4401). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered September 18, 1997, which, upon the granting of the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law after the close of evidence due to the plaintiffs’ failure to establish a prima facie case of negligence against the [540]*540defendant (see, CPLR 4401). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 539, 676 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karavas-fashions-ltd-v-bruni-campisi-inc-nyappdiv-1998.