Karam v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Karam v. Wolfe

30 A.2d 286, 129 N.J.L. 441, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 202

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 22, 1943·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

The judgment herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance —The Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Thompson, JJ. 7.

For reversal —The Chancellor, Case, Heher, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

The judgment herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance —The Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Thompson, JJ. 7.

For reversal —The Chancellor, Case, Heher, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.

Karam v. Wolfe, 30 A.2d 286, 129 N.J.L. 441, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1943).

Pincite

30 A.2d 286 (Karam v. Wolfe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.