Karam v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Karam v. Wolfe

30 A.2d 286, 129 N.J.L. 441, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 202

DecidedJanuary 22, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.2d 286 (Karam v. Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karam v. Wolfe, 30 A.2d 286, 129 N.J.L. 441, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

The judgment herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance —The Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Thompson, JJ. 7.

For reversal —The Chancellor, Case, Heher, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

The judgment herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance —The Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Thompson, JJ. 7.

For reversal —The Chancellor, Case, Heher, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.2d 286, 129 N.J.L. 441, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karam-v-wolfe-nj-1943.