Karam v. State
723 A.2d 943, 157 N.J. 187, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 56
This text of 723 A.2d 943 (Karam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Karam v. State, 723 A.2d 943, 157 N.J. 187, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 56 (N.J. 1999).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 308 N.J.Super. 225, 705 A.2d 1221 (1998).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Karam v. STATE, DEPT. OF ENVIR. PROTECTION
723 A.2d 943 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
723 A.2d 943, 157 N.J. 187, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karam-v-state-nj-1999.