Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.

201 A.3d 1023, 331 Conn. 904

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 27, 2019·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 857, 201 A.3d 500 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly construe and apply Brittell v. Department of Correction, 247 Conn. 148, 717 A.2d 1254 (1998), in holding that an action for constructive discharge in violation of public policy requires that the plaintiff allege and prove not only that the employer intended to create an intolerable work atmosphere but that the employer intended thereby to force the plaintiff to resign?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 857, 201 A.3d 500 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly construe and apply Brittell v. Department of Correction, 247 Conn. 148, 717 A.2d 1254 (1998), in holding that an action for constructive discharge in violation of public policy requires that the plaintiff allege and prove not only that the employer intended to create an intolerable work atmosphere but that the employer intended thereby to force the plaintiff to resign?"

Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc., 201 A.3d 1023, 331 Conn. 904 (Colo. 2019).

Pincite

201 A.3d 1023 (Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related