Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.

201 A.3d 1023, 331 Conn. 904
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 27, 2019
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 201 A.3d 1023 (Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc., 201 A.3d 1023, 331 Conn. 904 (Colo. 2019).

Opinion

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 857, 201 A.3d 500 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly construe and apply Brittell v. Department of Correction, 247 Conn. 148, 717 A.2d 1254 (1998), in holding that an action for constructive discharge in violation of public policy requires that the plaintiff allege and prove not only that the employer intended to create an intolerable work atmosphere but that the employer intended thereby to force the plaintiff to resign?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karagozian v. USV Optical, Inc.
335 Conn. 426 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)
Andrews v. Commissioner of Correction
194 Conn. App. 178 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.3d 1023, 331 Conn. 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karagozian-v-usv-optical-inc-conn-2019.