Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell

Fourth Circuit

Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell

470 F. App'x 198

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2012·No. No. 12-1026·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Aura Labro Karagiannopoulos appeals the district court’s order denying her post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell, No. 3:05-cv-00401-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 2011). We also deny Karagiannopoulos’ motion for a hearing en banc. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Aura Labro Karagiannopoulos appeals the district court’s order denying her post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell, No. 3:05-cv-00401-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 2011). We also deny Karagiannopoulos’ motion for a hearing en banc. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell, 470 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

470 F. App'x 198 (Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.