Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell

Fourth Circuit

Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell

470 F. App'x 198

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 29, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1026

StatusPublished

This text of 470 F. App'x 198 (Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell, 470 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Aura Labro Karagiannopoulos appeals the district court’s order denying her post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell, No. 3:05-cv-00401-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 2011). We also deny Karagiannopoulos’ motion for a hearing en banc. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Aura Labro Karagiannopoulos appeals the district court’s order denying her post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Karagiannopoulos v. City of Lowell, No. 3:05-cv-00401-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 2011). We also deny Karagiannopoulos’ motion for a hearing en banc. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

470 F. App'x 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karagiannopoulos-v-city-of-lowell-ca4-2012.