Karabajakyan v. Schwarzenegger

Ninth Circuit

Karabajakyan v. Schwarzenegger

377 F. App'x 647

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2010·No. No. 07-55859·Published

Opinion

[648] MEMORANDUM ***

The plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal of their third amended complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend. The plaintiffs also appeal the court’s order denying reconsideration of that dismissal as well as several procedural decisions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We affirm the dismissal of this action and the denial of reconsideration for the reasons stated by the district court. The plaintiffs’ contentions regarding judicial reassignment, recusal, and briefing deadlines lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[648] MEMORANDUM ***

The plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal of their third amended complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend. The plaintiffs also appeal the court’s order denying reconsideration of that dismissal as well as several procedural decisions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We affirm the dismissal of this action and the denial of reconsideration for the reasons stated by the district court. The plaintiffs’ contentions regarding judicial reassignment, recusal, and briefing deadlines lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Karabajakyan v. Schwarzenegger, 377 F. App'x 647 (9th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

377 F. App'x 647 (Karabajakyan v. Schwarzenegger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related