KAPUSTIJ v. City of Hamtramck
769 N.W.2d 691, 484 Mich. 872, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1678
Opinion
George KAPUSTIJ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HAMTRAMCK, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., not participating because of her relationship to the plaintiffs examining physician.
HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
KAPUSTIJ v. City of Hamtramck, 769 N.W.2d 691, 484 Mich. 872, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1678 (Mich. 2009).
769 N.W.2d 691 (KAPUSTIJ v. City of Hamtramck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.