Kaplin v. Kaplan

1 Conn. Super. Ct. 175, 1 Conn. Supp. 175, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 74
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 11, 1935
DocketFile #44275
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 175 (Kaplin v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplin v. Kaplan, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 175, 1 Conn. Supp. 175, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 74 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

BALDWIN, J.

The defendant was awarded a decree of divorce and alimony of Ten Dollars a week upon her cross' complaint. The parties, subsequent to the rendition of this decree and the award of alimony appeared in court and presented further facts relating to the plaintiff’s property and income. The plaintiff requested the court to determine the amount of alimony to be paid in a fixed or given amount and the defendant requested the court to increase the amount of alimony over that fixed in the decree if alimony be determined to be paid to the defendant weekly.

The defendant has an interest in the physical assets of a going business which interest is of the net worth of $5940.54. This, of course, does not include the value of his interest in the good will of this business. In the year of 1934, h.is share of the net profit of the business amounted to $3122.53.

The decree for alimony heretofore awarded by the Court is *176 modified as follows: From the date of this memorandum the defendant is awarded alimony in the sum of Twelve Dollars a week to be paid weekly until the further order of the court.

The plaintiff may, however, elect to pay alimony in a lump sum of Twenty-Five Hundred Dollars, and if he shall elect to pay such lump sum of Twenty-Five Hundred Dollars, then upon such payment such weekly alimony shall cease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Budrawich v. Budrawich
32 A.3d 328 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Maturo v. Maturo
995 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Conn. Super. Ct. 175, 1 Conn. Supp. 175, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplin-v-kaplan-connsuperct-1935.