Kaplan v. Utica Hill Crest Manor Corp.
This text of 26 A.D.2d 895 (Kaplan v. Utica Hill Crest Manor Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Williams, P. J., who dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaint. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida Trial Term for plaintiffs in a negligence action; also appeal by third-party plaintiff from judgment in favor of third-party defendant dismissing third-party complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.2d 895, 274 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-utica-hill-crest-manor-corp-nyappdiv-1966.