Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co.
133 Misc. 611, 233 N.Y.S. 113, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 661
Opinion
Plaintiffs were not transient persons within the meaning of the common-law rule which makes the innkeeper an insurer of the property of his guests. (Hancock v. Rand, 94 N. Y. 1; Crapo v. Rockwell, 48 Misc. 1.) Whether the defendant hotel is liable for the value of the stolen property on the ground of negligence is not before us.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellants to abide the event.
All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and Crain, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co., 133 Misc. 611, 233 N.Y.S. 113, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
133 Misc. 611 (Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hancock v. . Rand
94 N.Y. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Crapo v. Rockwell
48 Misc. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1905)