Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co.

Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co.

133 Misc. 611, 233 N.Y.S. 113, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 661
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 133 Misc. 611 (Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co., 133 Misc. 611, 233 N.Y.S. 113, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs were not transient persons within the meaning of the common-law rule which makes the innkeeper an insurer of the property of his guests. (Hancock v. Rand, 94 N. Y. 1; Crapo v. Rockwell, 48 Misc. 1.) Whether the defendant hotel is liable for the value of the stolen property on the ground of negligence is not before us.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellants to abide the event.

All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and Crain, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hancock v. . Rand
94 N.Y. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Crapo v. Rockwell
48 Misc. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 Misc. 611, 233 N.Y.S. 113, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-stogop-realty-co-nyappterm-1929.