Kaplan v. State

347 So. 2d 659
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 1977
DocketNo. 76-1491
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 347 So. 2d 659 (Kaplan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplan v. State, 347 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Robert C. Kaplan, challenges the sufficiency of an application for a search warrant made by a private citizen. We affirm.

Kaplan contends that a private citizen has no authority to apply for a search warrant. There is no Florida statute or rule restricting private citizens from signing applications for search warrants. Indeed, the firsthand quality of the information sworn to by a private citizen may be superior to hearsay statements presently allowed under the law to support search warrant applications.1 The same safeguards and other legal requirements for the issuance and service of search warrants apply regardless of who signs the application.2 We have also examined the contents of the application and find them sufficient to support the issuance of the warrant.

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE OF FLORIDA v. LEWIS STOUFFER, CLARK JEFFREY THOMPSON and CRAIG TURTURO
248 So. 3d 1165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Mason v. State
375 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Salerno v. State
347 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
347 So. 2d 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.