Kaplan v. State
This text of 347 So. 2d 659 (Kaplan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Robert C. Kaplan, challenges the sufficiency of an application for a search warrant made by a private citizen. We affirm.
Kaplan contends that a private citizen has no authority to apply for a search warrant. There is no Florida statute or rule restricting private citizens from signing applications for search warrants. Indeed, the firsthand quality of the information sworn to by a private citizen may be superior to hearsay statements presently allowed under the law to support search warrant applications.1 The same safeguards and other legal requirements for the issuance and service of search warrants apply regardless of who signs the application.2 We have also examined the contents of the application and find them sufficient to support the issuance of the warrant.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
347 So. 2d 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.