Kaplan v. State
697 So. 2d 144, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 471, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1051, 1997 WL 420192
Opinion
We granted review of Kaplan v. State, 681 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), based upon express and direct conflict with other decisions of this Court and courts in this state. [145] See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. However, after closer examination of the cases, we have determined that there is no express and direct conflict. Jurisdiction was therefore improvidently granted and the petition for review is accordingly dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaplan v. State, 697 So. 2d 144, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 471, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1051, 1997 WL 420192 (Fla. 1997).
697 So. 2d 144 (Kaplan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kaplan v. State
681 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)