Kaplan v. Prolife Action League

485 S.E.2d 54, 345 N.C. 753
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 10, 1997·No. No. 450A96·Published

Opinion

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 10 April 1997. Motion by defendants (Prolife Action, et al) to dismiss appeal in part allowed 10 April 1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaplan v. Prolife Action League, 485 S.E.2d 54, 345 N.C. 753 (N.C. 1997).

485 S.E.2d 54 (Kaplan v. Prolife Action League) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.