Kaplan v. Manoli
This text of 476 N.E.2d 649 (Kaplan v. Manoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (100 AD2d 928; see also, Frerk v Mercy Hosp., 99 AD2d 504, affd 63 NY2d 635).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Judges Jasen and Meyer on constraint of Parker v Mack (61 NY2d 114).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 N.E.2d 649, 64 N.Y.2d 849, 487 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-manoli-ny-1985.