Kaplan v. Manoli
476 N.E.2d 649, 64 N.Y.2d 849, 487 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14176
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (100 AD2d 928; see also, Frerk v Mercy Hosp., 99 AD2d 504, affd 63 NY2d 635).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Judges Jasen and Meyer on constraint of Parker v Mack (61 NY2d 114).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaplan v. Manoli, 476 N.E.2d 649, 64 N.Y.2d 849, 487 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14176 (N.Y. 1985).
476 N.E.2d 649 (Kaplan v. Manoli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Micro-Spy, Inc. v. Small
9 A.D.3d 122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Burrell v. Countrytowne Apartment Partnership
247 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Wells v. Mount Sinai Hospital and Medical Center
196 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Long Island Citizens Campaign, Inc. v. County of Nassau
165 A.D.2d 52 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Farkas v. Tarrytown Lumber, Inc.
133 A.D.2d 251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)