Kaplan v. Lucille Roberts Health Clubs Inc.

63 A.D.3d 470, 880 N.Y.S.2d 284

This text of 63 A.D.3d 470 (Kaplan v. Lucille Roberts Health Clubs Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplan v. Lucille Roberts Health Clubs Inc., 63 A.D.3d 470, 880 N.Y.S.2d 284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered March 28, 2008, which granted defendant health club’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

There are issues of fact as to whether, inter alia, plaintiff, a paying member at the club, was limited to choosing among [471]*471defective step-aerobic boards supplied by the club for participation in a club-sponsored class, and whether defendants had notice that a fair number of those boards allegedly lacked stabilizing bottom grips. Factual issues exist as to whether the absence of these grips unreasonably increased the risk of use of the boards, whether this risk was apparent to plaintiff, and whether it proximately caused her injury (see e.g. Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471 [1997]).

The question of spoliation of evidence is reserved for the trial court’s consideration. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. State
685 N.E.2d 202 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.3d 470, 880 N.Y.S.2d 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-lucille-roberts-health-clubs-inc-nyappdiv-2009.