Kaplan v. Koenig, Esthetic Realty Corporation
166 N.E. 348, 250 N.Y. 624, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 1025
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs against both appellants; no opinion.
Concur: Gardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaplan v. Koenig, Esthetic Realty Corporation, 166 N.E. 348, 250 N.Y. 624, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 1025 (N.Y. 1929).
166 N.E. 348 (Kaplan v. Koenig, Esthetic Realty Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Troy Bank & Trust Company v. Brantley
82 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Schenectady Trust Co. v. Emmons
263 A.D. 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)