Kaplan v. Kaplan
This text of 232 A.D. 678 (Kaplan v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, the following questions to be certified: (1) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? (2) May a person legally declared incompetent maintain an action for a separation through a duly authorized representative? Motion to extend time to plead granted. Motion for stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1931.