Kaplan v. Kaplan

232 A.D. 678

This text of 232 A.D. 678 (Kaplan v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplan v. Kaplan, 232 A.D. 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, the following questions to be certified: (1) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? (2) May a person legally declared incompetent maintain an action for a separation through a duly authorized representative? Motion to extend time to plead granted. Motion for stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1931.