Kaplan v. Kaplan
183 A. 897, 120 N.J. Eq. 75, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 679
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order adjudging the defendant-appellant in contempt for failing to comply with an order made in the court of chancery, providing alimony for the petitioner.
We have examined the proofs and concur in the finding of the advisory master.
The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance- — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaplan v. Kaplan, 183 A. 897, 120 N.J. Eq. 75, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 679 (N.J. 1936).
183 A. 897 (Kaplan v. Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.