Kaplan v. Kaplan
This text of 183 A. 897 (Kaplan v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order adjudging the defendant-appellant in contempt for failing to comply with an order made in the court of chancery, providing alimony for the petitioner.
We have examined the proofs and concur in the finding of the advisory master.
The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance- — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 A. 897, 120 N.J. Eq. 75, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-kaplan-nj-1936.