Kaplan v. Kaplan

100 So. 3d 138, 2012 WL 4795668, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17418
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-3794
StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 3d 138 (Kaplan v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplan v. Kaplan, 100 So. 3d 138, 2012 WL 4795668, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17418 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

WARNER, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 So. 3d 138, 2012 WL 4795668, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-kaplan-fladistctapp-2012.