Kaplan v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaplan v. Hults

11 A.D.2d 1059, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7535

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 1059 (Kaplan v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaplan v. Hults, 11 A.D.2d 1059, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioner to dispense with printing of certain exhibits and documents. Motion granted to the extent of dispensing with the printing of the exhibits and documents enumerated in the supporting affidavit, except the minutes of the hearing. The minutes must be printed. The originals or photostat copies of the exhibits and documents not printed shall be submitted on the argument. On the court’s own motion, the proceeding is ordered on the calendar for the December Term, beginning November 28, 1960, and petitioner is given leave to submit a typewritten brief. Six copies of such brief must be filed and one copy served upon the Attorney-General on or before November 14, 1960. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner to dispense with printing of certain exhibits and documents. Motion granted to the extent of dispensing with the printing of the exhibits and documents enumerated in the supporting affidavit, except the minutes of the hearing. The minutes must be printed. The originals or photostat copies of the exhibits and documents not printed shall be submitted on the argument. On the court’s own motion, the proceeding is ordered on the calendar for the December Term, beginning November 28, 1960, and petitioner is given leave to submit a typewritten brief. Six copies of such brief must be filed and one copy served upon the Attorney-General on or before November 14, 1960. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 1059, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-hults-nyappdiv-1960.