Kaplan v. Herman, Interborough Rapid Transit Company

180 N.E. 338, 258 N.Y. 573, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1236
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 5, 1932·Published

Opinion

On appeal by defendant Herman from the judgment in favor of plaintiffs, judgment affirmed, with costs. On appeal by the defendant Herman from the order granting new trial as to his co-defendant Interborough Rapid Transit Company, appeal dismissed, with costs on authority of Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corporation (258 N. Y. 124).

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaplan v. Herman, Interborough Rapid Transit Company, 180 N.E. 338, 258 N.Y. 573, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1236 (N.Y. 1932).

180 N.E. 338 (Kaplan v. Herman, Interborough Rapid Transit Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp.
179 N.E. 317 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)