Kaplan v. Herman, Interborough Rapid Transit Company

New York Court of Appeals

Kaplan v. Herman, Interborough Rapid Transit Company

180 N.E. 338, 258 N.Y. 573, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1236

DecidedJanuary 5, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 180 N.E. 338 (Kaplan v. Herman, Interborough Rapid Transit Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaplan v. Herman, Interborough Rapid Transit Company, 180 N.E. 338, 258 N.Y. 573, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1236 (N.Y. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

On appeal by defendant Herman from the judgment in favor of plaintiffs, judgment affirmed, with costs. On appeal by the defendant Herman from the order granting new trial as to his co-defendant Interborough Rapid Transit Company, appeal dismissed, with costs on authority of Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corporation (258 N. Y. 124).

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appeal by defendant Herman from the judgment in favor of plaintiffs, judgment affirmed, with costs. On appeal by the defendant Herman from the order granting new trial as to his co-defendant Interborough Rapid Transit Company, appeal dismissed, with costs on authority of Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corporation (258 N. Y. 124).

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 N.E. 338, 258 N.Y. 573, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-herman-interborough-rapid-transit-company-ny-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack