Kaplan v. Herbstein

175 A.D.2d 200
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 175 A.D.2d 200 (Kaplan v. Herbstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplan v. Herbstein, 175 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

— In an action .to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants Gregory Carsen, Gregory Carsen, M.D., P.C., Barry Held, Robert Meisell, Alex Tallis, Lawrence Schechter and William Wolff appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), entered September 28, 1989, as denied their motion for a protective order as to demand No. 1 of the plaintiff’s notice for discovery and inspection.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that the supervision of disclosure and the setting of reasonable terms and conditions therefor rests within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Matter of U. S. Pioneer Elec. Corp. [Nikko Elec. Corp.], 47 NY2d 914, 916; Boylin v Eagle Telephonies, 130 AD2d 538) and, absent an improvident exercise of that discretion, its determination will not be disturbed (see, Cable v IBM Corp., 101 AD2d 799; see also, PCB Piezotronics v Change, 163 AD2d 829). We find that no improvident exercise of discretion has been demonstrated in the instant matter. The fee schedule information contained in the contract sought by the plaintiff may be material and [201]*201relevant to determining the degree of control exercised by the defendant Booth Memorial Medical Center over the radiology group headed by the appellant Barry Held. The group also apparently included the appellants Robert Meisell, Alex Tallis, Lawrence Schechter, and William Wolff. This information may, therefore, bear upon the issue of Booth Memorial Medical Center’s vicarious liability for the negligence of an individual member of the radiology group (see, Kavanaugh v Nussbaum, 71 NY2d 535, 547; Hill v St. Clare’s Hosp., 67 NY2d 72, 79; Mertsaris v 73rd Corp., 105 AD2d 67, 80; Mduba v Benedictine Hosp., 52 AD2d 450). Accordingly, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noy v. Noy
2018 NY Slip Op 2639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
306 Rutledge, LLC v. City of New York
90 A.D.3d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
JRP Old Riverhead Ltd. v. Town of Southampton
73 A.D.3d 1130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Spodek v. Neiss
70 A.D.3d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Tucker v. Bay Shore Storage Warehouse, Inc.
69 A.D.3d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Rinaldi v. Evenflo Co.
62 A.D.3d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Gilman & Ciocia, Inc. v. Walsh
45 A.D.3d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Coven v. Lutheran Medical Center
2 A.D.3d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Singer v. Singer
2003 NY Slip Op 51519(U) (New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, 2003)
Gilman & Ciocia, Inc. v. Pasquin
296 A.D.2d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Provident Life & Casualty Insurance v. Brittenham
284 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Estate of Tarka
268 A.D.2d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Bakmezian v. St. Luke's Hospital
259 A.D.2d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Board of Education v. Lomasney Combustion, Inc.
246 A.D.2d 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Zappi v. Pedigree Ski Shop, Inc.
244 A.D.2d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Estate of Winston
238 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Salkey v. Mott
237 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Sumitomo Bank of New York Trust Co. v. Town of North Hempstead
236 A.D.2d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Silcox v. City of New York
233 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
City of Mount Vernon v. Lexington Insurance
232 A.D.2d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D.2d 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-herbstein-nyappdiv-1991.