Kaplan v. Goldfarb

777 So. 2d 1208, 2001 WL 166703
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2001·No. 3D00-1068·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

777 So.2d 1208 (2001)

Teresa KAPLAN, Appellant,
v.
Sharon GOLDFARB, Appellee.

No. 3D00-1068.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 21, 2001.

James T. Sparkman, Fort Lauderdale, and John W. Gautier, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Wolpe & Leibowitz and Bradley H. Trushin and Nicole M. McNeel, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Teresa Kaplan appeals the denial of her Motion to Tax Attorney's Fees and Costs. The motion was brought pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1990). We reverse because the release and dismissal provisions requested in Kaplan's Offer of Judgment are not invalidating conditions. See Earnest & Stewart, Inc. v. Codina, 732 So.2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaplan v. Goldfarb, 777 So. 2d 1208, 2001 WL 166703 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

777 So. 2d 1208 (Kaplan v. Goldfarb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols
932 So. 2d 1067 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Columbro v. State
777 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)