Kaplan v. Goldfarb
This text of 777 So. 2d 1208 (Kaplan v. Goldfarb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Teresa KAPLAN, Appellant,
v.
Sharon GOLDFARB, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
James T. Sparkman, Fort Lauderdale, and John W. Gautier, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Wolpe & Leibowitz and Bradley H. Trushin and Nicole M. McNeel, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Teresa Kaplan appeals the denial of her Motion to Tax Attorney's Fees and Costs. The motion was brought pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1990). We reverse because the release and dismissal provisions requested in Kaplan's Offer of Judgment are not invalidating conditions. See Earnest & Stewart, Inc. v. Codina, 732 So.2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
777 So. 2d 1208, 2001 WL 166703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-goldfarb-fladistctapp-2001.