Kaplan v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.
This text of 29 F.3d 111 (Kaplan v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.
By the Court,
DATED: June 29,1994
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 F.3d 111, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16517, 1994 WL 362576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-first-options-of-chicago-inc-ca3-1994.