Kaplan v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.
29 F.3d 111, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16517, 1994 WL 362576
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 29, 1994·No. No. 92-1814·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.
By the Court,
DATED: June 29,1994
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaplan v. First Options of Chicago, Inc., 29 F.3d 111, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16517, 1994 WL 362576 (3d Cir. 1994).
29 F.3d 111 (Kaplan v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cigna Ins. Co. of Puerto Rico v. M/V SKANDERBORG
897 F. Supp. 659 (D. Puerto Rico, 1995)
Rodriguez v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
882 F. Supp. 1202 (D. Puerto Rico, 1995)