Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp.
This text of Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp. (Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 10-2477
RICHARD E. KAPLAN,
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION and NEIL ELLIS,
Defendants, Appellants.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Thompson, Circuit Judges, and Saris,* District Judge.
Lee H. Kozol, with whom Friedman & Atherton LLP, Peter W. Culley, Pierce Atwood LLP, Joseph H. Groff, III and Jensen Baird Gardner & Henry, were on brief for appellants. Ben Robbins, with whom Martin J. Newhouse and New England Legal Foundation, as amicus curiae in support of appellant First Hartford Corporation. Thomas C. Newman, with whom Richard L. O'Meara, Nicole L. Bradick and Murray, Plumb & Murray, was on brief for appellee.
August 17, 2011
* Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation. Per Curiam. This case is affirmed on substantially the
same grounds as stated in the opinions of the district court. See
Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp., 716 F. Supp. 2d 11 (D. Me. 2010);
Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp., 484 F. Supp. 2d 131 (D. Me. 2007).
The appeal is dismissed. Costs allowed to appellees.
It is so ordered.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-first-hartford-corp-ca1-2011.