Kaplan v. Department of Highways
This text of 15 Ct. Cl. 296 (Kaplan v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This claim was originally filed in the name of Allen Kaplan, but when the testimony established that the damaged vehicle, a 1984 BMW 318-1, was titled in the name of Allen Kaplan and his mother, Pauline Kaplan, the Court, on its own motion, amended the style of the claim to reflect that fact.
On March 24, 1984, the claimant was driving his vehicle on 5th Avenue in Huntington, West Virginia, when he struck a pothole. The left front rim was damaged. The claimant testified that he drove the road daily, but had not noticed the pothole. He had no knowledge as to how long the pothole had been in existence.
The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of travellers on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order for the respondent to be found liable for the damages incurred, proof of notice of the defect must be shown. As there was no evidence of notice to respondent, the claim must be denied.
Claim disallowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ct. Cl. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1985.