Kaplan v. Department of Health

886 So. 2d 279, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16622, 2004 WL 2482286
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 5, 2004
DocketNo. 1D04-4342
StatusPublished

This text of 886 So. 2d 279 (Kaplan v. Department of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplan v. Department of Health, 886 So. 2d 279, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16622, 2004 WL 2482286 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as legally insufficient. Mandamus will lie to require the performance of a ministerial duty imposed by law on a public official or agency. See Sancho v. Joanos, 715 So.2d 382 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). However, petitioner has failed to identify any legal authority imposing on the Department of Health a clear and indisputable duty to take the action he seeks to compel.

PETITION DENIED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sancho v. Joanos
715 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
886 So. 2d 279, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16622, 2004 WL 2482286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-department-of-health-fladistctapp-2004.