Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kaplan v. Defoe Corp.

Kaplan v. Defoe Corp.

32 A.D.3d 790, 821 N.Y.S.2d 562
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.3d 790 (Kaplan v. Defoe Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaplan v. Defoe Corp., 32 A.D.3d 790, 821 N.Y.S.2d 562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered June 1, 2005, which, inter alia, denied as untimely defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellants’ summary judgment motion was made almost one year after the deadline for making summary judgment motions set by the court, and appellants failed to show good cause for their delay (see CPLR 3212 [a]; Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648 [2004]; Perini Corp. v City of New York [Department of Envtl. Protection], 16 AD3d 37 [2005]; Colon v City of New York, 15 AD3d 173 [2005]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brill v. City of New York
814 N.E.2d 431 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
Colon v. City of New York
15 A.D.3d 173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Perini Corp. v. City of New York
16 A.D.3d 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A.D.3d 790, 821 N.Y.S.2d 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-defoe-corp-nyappdiv-2006.