Kaplan v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaplan v. Cohen

243 A.D. 814

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 814 (Kaplan v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaplan v. Cohen, 243 A.D. 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

— Actions to foreclose mortgages on real property. Judgments dismissing the eomplamts on the merits affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the findings of usury at the inception of the mortgages, on September 16, 1925, are supported by the evidence. Hagarty, Tompkms, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that it was error to admit evidence as to the subsequent transactions respecting the extension agreements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Actions to foreclose mortgages on real property. Judgments dismissing the eomplamts on the merits affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the findings of usury at the inception of the mortgages, on September 16, 1925, are supported by the evidence. Hagarty, Tompkms, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that it was error to admit evidence as to the subsequent transactions respecting the extension agreements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1935.