Kaplan v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaplan v. City of New York

237 A.D.2d 129, 655 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2207

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 237 A.D.2d 129 (Kaplan v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaplan v. City of New York, 237 A.D.2d 129, 655 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about May 16, 1996, which denied defendant commercial tenant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims as against it, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Issues of fact exist as to whether defendant discharged grease into the building’s sewer system thereby causing an obstruction that caused an overflow of waste water through the fresh air vent onto the sidewalk that, upon freezing, caused plaintiffs fall. Defendant’s claims of lack of notice of the condition and of the inapplicability of the recurrent condition theory are improperly raised for the first time on appeal; in any event, upon the present record, defendant does not conclusively negate knowledge that its operation of a grease-generating restaurant was causing recurring problems with the building’s sewage system (see, Scott v Board of Educ., 193 AD2d 489). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about May 16, 1996, which denied defendant commercial tenant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims as against it, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Issues of fact exist as to whether defendant discharged grease into the building’s sewer system thereby causing an obstruction that caused an overflow of waste water through the fresh air vent onto the sidewalk that, upon freezing, caused plaintiffs fall. Defendant’s claims of lack of notice of the condition and of the inapplicability of the recurrent condition theory are improperly raised for the first time on appeal; in any event, upon the present record, defendant does not conclusively negate knowledge that its operation of a grease-generating restaurant was causing recurring problems with the building’s sewage system (see, Scott v Board of Educ., 193 AD2d 489). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 129, 655 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack