Kaplan v. Anderson
This text of 229 A.D. 822 (Kaplan v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, and on account of the improper opening and prejudicial [823]*823conduct on the part of the defendant’s attorney on the trial. Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaplan-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1930.