Kao v. Chang
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
07-MAR-2024
09:18 AM
Dkt. 7 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
MARTIN KAO and TIFFANY JENNIFER LAM, Petitioners, vs.
THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,
and
NAVATEK CAPITAL INC., individually and derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant PacMar Technologies LLC, fka Martin Defense Group, LLC, fka Navatek LLC, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed December 22, 2023, and the record, Petitioners have not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to obtain the relief sought. See
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 7, 2024.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kao v. Chang (Kao v. Chang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.