Kao v. Amuchastegui

252 So. 3d 397
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 8, 2018
DocketNo. 3D18-644
StatusPublished

This text of 252 So. 3d 397 (Kao v. Amuchastegui) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kao v. Amuchastegui, 252 So. 3d 397 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; Jackson v. Echols, 937 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Echols
937 So. 2d 1247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 So. 3d 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kao-v-amuchastegui-fladistctapp-2018.