Kanzer v. George

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kanzer v. George

270 A.D. 903, 61 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4561

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D. 903 (Kanzer v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kanzer v. George, 270 A.D. 903, 61 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by permission of this court from an order of the Appellate Term reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the plaintiff, and dismissing the complaint, in an action to recover damages for the loss of personal property while plaintiff occupied a room in the defendant’s establishment. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Mowers v. Fethers, 61 N. Y. 34; Roberts v. Case Hotel Co., Inc., 106 Mise. 481; Rosenberg v. Hotel Taft Corp., N. Y. L. J., Nbv. 13, 1941, p. 1477, col. 1; Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co., Inc., 133 Mise. 611; Crapo v. Rockwell, 48 Mise. 1; Waitt Construction Go., Inc., v. Chase, 197 App. Div. 327; Stewart v. McCready, 24 How. Prac. 62.) ' Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by permission of this court from an order of the Appellate Term reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the plaintiff, and dismissing the complaint, in an action to recover damages for the loss of personal property while plaintiff occupied a room in the defendant’s establishment. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Mowers v. Fethers, 61 N. Y. 34; Roberts v. Case Hotel Co., Inc., 106 Mise. 481; Rosenberg v. Hotel Taft Corp., N. Y. L. J., Nbv. 13, 1941, p. 1477, col. 1; Kaplan v. Stogop Realty Co., Inc., 133 Mise. 611; Crapo v. Rockwell, 48 Mise. 1; Waitt Construction Go., Inc., v. Chase, 197 App. Div. 327; Stewart v. McCready, 24 How. Prac. 62.) ' Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D. 903, 61 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanzer-v-george-nyappdiv-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack