Kantz v. Fugate & Girton Driveway Co.

Sixth Circuit

Kantz v. Fugate & Girton Driveway Co.

187 F.2d 334

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 1951

DocketNo. 11236

StatusPublished

This text of 187 F.2d 334 (Kantz v. Fugate & Girton Driveway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kantz v. Fugate & Girton Driveway Co., 187 F.2d 334 (6th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and after consideration of the contention of the appellants that the District Court erred in directing the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, and it appearing that there was no error in the direction of the verdict or in the judgment entered, after due consideration,

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and after consideration of the contention of the appellants that the District Court erred in directing the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, and it appearing that there was no error in the direction of the verdict or in the judgment entered, after due consideration,

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 F.2d 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kantz-v-fugate-girton-driveway-co-ca6-1951.