Kantrowitz v. 150 Greene Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kantrowitz v. 150 Greene Street Corp.

88 A.D.2d 823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.2d 823 (Kantrowitz v. 150 Greene Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kantrowitz v. 150 Greene Street Corp., 88 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cahn, J.), entered on April 15, 1981, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion to set aside a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $500,000 only to the extent that such verdict is excessive, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce said verdict to $125,000 within 30 days after the date of said order, and which denied third-party defendant-respondent-appellant’s motion to set aside the verdict rendered against it, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of granting the defendant-respondent’s motion to set aside the v.erdict as excessive unless plaintiff, within 30 days after the date of entry of this court’s order, stipulates to reduce the verdict to $250,000, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Fein, Lynch and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cahn, J.), entered on April 15, 1981, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion to set aside a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $500,000 only to the extent that such verdict is excessive, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce said verdict to $125,000 within 30 days after the date of said order, and which denied third-party defendant-respondent-appellant’s motion to set aside the verdict rendered against it, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of granting the defendant-respondent’s motion to set aside the v.erdict as excessive unless plaintiff, within 30 days after the date of entry of this court’s order, stipulates to reduce the verdict to $250,000, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Fein, Lynch and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kantrowitz-v-150-greene-street-corp-nyappdiv-1982.