Kantor v. Kantor

1994 OK 132, 886 P.2d 480, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 155, 1994 WL 680224
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 5, 1994
DocketNo. 84428
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1994 OK 132 (Kantor v. Kantor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kantor v. Kantor, 1994 OK 132, 886 P.2d 480, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 155, 1994 WL 680224 (Okla. 1994).

Opinion

CORRECTION ORDER

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted and this appeal is dismissed. The trial judge’s September 9, 1994 order, which orders appellant to pay appellee’s attorney fees during the pendency of their divorce action, is not appealable. Nuckolls v. Nuckolls, 356 P.2d 1089 (Okl.1960).

The provisions of 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 993(A)(5), by which orders directing the payment of money pendente lite are appeal-able, do not apply to temporary support orders or orders for the payment of temporary attorney fees in matrimonial cases. The latter are predicated on the general duty of parental or spousal support.

[481]*481All Justices concur.

/s/ Ralph B. Hodges Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY
2009 OK 91 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)
S.W. v. Duncan
2001 OK 39 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 OK 132, 886 P.2d 480, 1994 Okla. LEXIS 155, 1994 WL 680224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kantor-v-kantor-okla-1994.