Kantor Silk Mills, Inc. v. Sun Insurance Office of London
209 A.D. 872
Opinion
Order modified by denying the motion as to items 1 to 7 inclusive, as not proper subjects for a bill of particulars (See Herzig v. Washington Fire Ins. Co., 143 App. Div. 386), and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. The bill of particulars to be served within twenty days from service of order. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kantor Silk Mills, Inc. v. Sun Insurance Office of London, 209 A.D. 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
209 A.D. 872 (Kantor Silk Mills, Inc. v. Sun Insurance Office of London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herzig v. Washington Fire Insurance
143 A.D. 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)