Kantola v. Kantola

2026 ND 57
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 26, 2026
DocketNo. 20250407
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 ND 57 (Kantola v. Kantola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kantola v. Kantola, 2026 ND 57 (N.D. 2026).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2026 ND 57

Sandra Rae Kantola, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Robert Douglas Kantola, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20250407

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Nicholas W. Chase, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Shannon E. Parvey, West Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Robert D. Kantola, self-represented, West Fargo, N.D., defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. Kantola v. Kantola No. 20250407

[¶1] Robert Kantola appeals from a divorce judgment distributing the parties’ marital property. Sandra Kantola requests attorney’s fees and costs for a frivolous appeal under N.D.R.App.P. 38.

[¶2] Robert Kantola argues that the district court did not analyze the Ruff- Fischer factors when dividing the marital estate. The court’s order contradicts his assertion and shows that the court considered every factor. He also argues under the partition statute, N.D.C.C. § 32-16-01, and the doctrine of unjust enrichment that the court clearly erred in the property division. Any reliance on these theories is misplaced because this is a divorce action governed by N.D.C.C. ch. 14-05. See Berger v. Repnow, 2025 ND 25, ¶ 5, 16 N.W.3d 452.

[¶3] We conclude that this appeal is frivolous. Buchholz v. Buchholz, 2022 ND 203, ¶ 43, 982 N.W.2d 275. We award Sandra double costs and attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,000. Sandra did not submit a statement of fees. When a party requests more than a token amount of attorney’s fees on appeal, the request should be accompanied by an affidavit or statement documenting the work performed. See United Bank of Bismarck v. Young, 401 N.W.2d 517, 519 n.1 (N.D. 1987); In re Est. of Nelson, 2018 ND 118, ¶ 13, 910 N.W.2d 856. When no such documentation accompanies the request, we may award a fixed amount of attorney’s fees at our discretion. See In re Est. of Nelson, 2018 ND 118, ¶ 14 (awarding $500 absent supporting documentation); see also United Valley Bank v. Lamb, 2003 ND 149, ¶ 5, 669 N.W.2d 117 (awarding $1,000 toward the bank’s attorney’s fees without supporting documentation).

[¶4] We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). We award Sandra Kantola double costs and attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,000.

[¶5] Lisa Fair McEvers, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen Douglas A. Bahr 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Valley Bank v. Lamb
2003 ND 149 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2003)
United Bank of Bismarck v. Young
401 N.W.2d 517 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
Williston v. Solberg (In Re Estate)
2018 ND 118 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 ND 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kantola-v-kantola-nd-2026.