Kanter v. . New Amsterdam Casualty Company
135 N.E. 935, 233 N.Y. 602, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1022
This text of 135 N.E. 935 (Kanter v. . New Amsterdam Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kanter v. . New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 135 N.E. 935, 233 N.Y. 602, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1022 (N.Y. 1922).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
Dissenting: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pennsylvania Cement Co. v. Bradley Contracting Co.
11 F.2d 687 (Second Circuit, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 N.E. 935, 233 N.Y. 602, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanter-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-company-ny-1922.