Kanter v. Cooper

277 A.D.2d 1143

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1143 (Kanter v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kanter v. Cooper, 277 A.D.2d 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order granting plaintiff’s motion to preclude proof of a separate defense in an answer unless a bill of particulars is served within twenty days, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. When matter which could be proved under a general denial is unnecessarily pleaded as a separate and distinct defense, the plaintiff is entitled to a bill of particulars under rule 115 of the Rules of Civil Practice. (Burns v. Lipson, 204 App. Div. 643.) Cases to the contrary which defendant invokes are obsolete. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burns v. Lipson
204 A.D. 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanter-v-cooper-nyappdiv-1950.