Kant v. Bergman

97 A.D. 118, 89 N.Y.S. 593
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 A.D. 118 (Kant v. Bergman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kant v. Bergman, 97 A.D. 118, 89 N.Y.S. 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We think that section 3297 and subdivision 6 of section 3307 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not authorize the referee to charge fifty cents for receiving the judgment of sale. Subdivision 11 of the latter section specifies services for which a fee may be charged, the same as for similar services upon the sale of real property by virtue of an execution, but itdoes not include and, therefore impliedly excludes a fee for receiving the judgment.

The referee was not entitled to more than ten dollars for commissions allowed by section 3297 of the Code of Civil Procedure, inasmuch as it appeal’s that such commissions are based upon a sum bid by a party and applied upon that party’s demand as fixed by the judgment without being paid to the referee.

The order is thus modified and, as modified, is affirmed, without costs.

All concurred.

Order modified in accordance with opinion of Jenks, J., and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harburger v. St. John's African Methodist Episcopal Church
87 Misc. 227 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.D. 118, 89 N.Y.S. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kant-v-bergman-nyappdiv-1904.