Kansas v. Nebraska

538 U.S. 720, 123 S. Ct. 1898, 155 L. Ed. 2d 951, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4058
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 19, 2003·No. 126 ORIG·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Final Report of the Special Master is received and ordered filed.

DECREE

This cause, having come to be heard on the Second Report of the Special Master appointed by this Court, and on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Final Settlement Stipulation, which accompanies said Report, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Final Settlement Stipulation executed by all of the parties to this case and filed with the Special Master on December 16, 2002, is approved;

2. This action is recommitted to the Special Master for the sole purpose of deciding procedural questions arising in the completion by the state parties of the RRCA Groundwater Model pursuant to the binding procedures prescribed by the Final Settlement Stipulation. All claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims for which leave to file was or could have been sought in this case arising prior to December 15, 2002, are hereby dismissed with prejudice effective upon the filing by the Special Master of a final report certifying adoption of the RRCA Groundwater Model by the state parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kansas v. Nebraska, 538 U.S. 720, 123 S. Ct. 1898, 155 L. Ed. 2d 951, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4058 (2003).

538 U.S. 720 (Kansas v. Nebraska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frenchman Cambridge Irrigation District v. Heineman
974 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (D. Nebraska, 2013)
Doyle v. Archuleta
370 F. App'x 934 (Tenth Circuit, 2010)
Kansas v. Colorado
543 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 2004)