Kansas v. Nebraska

Supreme Court

Kansas v. Nebraska

538 U.S. 720, 123 S. Ct. 1898, 155 L. Ed. 2d 951, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4058

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 19, 2003

Docket126 ORIG

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 538 U.S. 720 (Kansas v. Nebraska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kansas v. Nebraska, 538 U.S. 720, 123 S. Ct. 1898, 155 L. Ed. 2d 951, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4058 (2003).

Pincite

Opinion

The Final Report of the Special Master is received and ordered filed.

DECREE

This cause, having come to be heard on the Second Report of the Special Master appointed by this Court, and on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Final Settlement Stipulation, which accompanies said Report, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Final Settlement Stipulation executed by all of the parties to this case and filed with the Special Master on December 16, 2002, is approved;

2. This action is recommitted to the Special Master for the sole purpose of deciding procedural questions arising in the completion by the state parties of the RRCA Groundwater Model pursuant to the binding procedures prescribed by the Final Settlement Stipulation. All claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims for which leave to file was or could have been sought in this case arising prior to December 15, 2002, are hereby dismissed with prejudice effective upon the filing by the Special Master of a final report certifying adoption of the RRCA Groundwater Model by the state parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Final Report of the Special Master is received and ordered filed.

DECREE

This cause, having come to be heard on the Second Report of the Special Master appointed by this Court, and on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Final Settlement Stipulation, which accompanies said Report, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Final Settlement Stipulation executed by all of the parties to this case and filed with the Special Master on December 16, 2002, is approved;

2. This action is recommitted to the Special Master for the sole purpose of deciding procedural questions arising in the completion by the state parties of the RRCA Groundwater Model pursuant to the binding procedures prescribed by the Final Settlement Stipulation. All claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims for which leave to file was or could have been sought in this case arising prior to December 15, 2002, are hereby dismissed with prejudice effective upon the filing by the Special Master of a final report certifying adoption of the RRCA Groundwater Model by the state parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 U.S. 720, 123 S. Ct. 1898, 155 L. Ed. 2d 951, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-v-nebraska-scotus-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack