Kansas v. Marsh
This text of 544 U.S. 1060 (Kansas v. Marsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Kan. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: “Does this Court have jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1257, as construed by Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469 (1975)?”; “Was the Kansas Supreme Court’s judgment adequately supported by a ground independent of federal law?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
544 U.S. 1060, 125 S. Ct. 2517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kansas-v-marsh-scotus-2005.