Kansas v. Marsh
544 U.S. 1060, 125 S. Ct. 2517
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Kan. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: “Does this Court have jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1257, as construed by Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469 (1975)?”; “Was the Kansas Supreme Court’s judgment adequately supported by a ground independent of federal law?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kansas v. Marsh, 544 U.S. 1060, 125 S. Ct. 2517 (2005).
544 U.S. 1060 (Kansas v. Marsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Puckett v. Epps
615 F. Supp. 2d 494 (S.D. Mississippi, 2009)