Home/Supreme Court/Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Blackwell

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Blackwell

523 U.S. 1134, 118 S. Ct. 1834, 140 L. Ed. 2d 968, 66 U.S.L.W. 3749, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 3373
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 18, 1998·No. No. 97-471·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

522 U. S. 1068. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Blackwell, 523 U.S. 1134, 118 S. Ct. 1834, 140 L. Ed. 2d 968, 66 U.S.L.W. 3749, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 3373 (1998).

523 U.S. 1134 (Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Blackwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riley v. Cockrell
215 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Texas, 2002)
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Roger Associates, Inc.
194 F.3d 922 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Kansas Public Employees Retirement, System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc., A, Kansas Corporation Ronald Reimer, an Individual Kenneth H. Koger, Anindividual Clifford W. Shinski, an Individual Brent Messick, an Individual Robert Crew, an Individual Sherman Dreiseszun, an Individual I. I. Ozar, an Individual Frank Sebree, an Individual - Michael K. Russell, an Individual, Gage & Tucker, a Law Partnership Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., an Accountancy Firm Kpmg Peat Marwick, an Accountancy Firm Robert Spence, an Individual Thomas S. Morgan, Co-Executor of the Estate of Frank S. Morgan Marilyn J., Co-Executor of the Estate of Frank Morgan, - C. Patrick McLarney Substituted for Shook Hardy Law Firm, Intervenor - Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Blackwell, Sanders, Peper, Martin, L.L.P. William H. Sanders, Sr., Individually and as the Representative of a Class
194 F.3d 922 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)